As the university students in the 1960s and 1970s experienced 'former President Parks oppressive yusin policies and Chuns excesses during the Kwangju massacre', they had a 'general consciousness of the threat that both their own society and imperialistic policies of USA ', they felt the need to become 'the centre of political and social change in the 1980s '. Many directors who made films in the late 1980s and early 1990s were from this period of time, thus most made numerous realism films.
The Korean title and the English translated title is completely different each other literally, as the korean translation means beautiful (young) man. However, there is a correlation in that both signify some kind of being that is passionate and extremely generous being, which seems to explain Jeon tae il 's characteristics.
The film presents yongsoo 's life in color and jeon taeil 's life in black and white as a flashlight. This distinction represents the same ideas and goals that both men had in different time periods, which seemed to me that there is an ongoing endeavor for a better working life for laborers.
At the end of the movie, Jeon tae il carries the book that yongsoo wrote - this portrays that there would be many more jeontaeil-like heroes to come, and see him as an inspiration as he was the brave initiative to enact better conditions for the workers.
Jeon tae il seems extremely mature for his age as he is very young, and about the same age as most of us in the class, however, he managed to help millions of laborers to work in better working conditions. As he yelled 'we are not machines ' when he lit himself on fire, he was truly proving his sentence as he showed that he was a human being with a generous heart who sacrificed himself for many others.
No comments:
Post a Comment