The intercut
between the story of Kim and Jeon is where director Park discusses this theme.
By applying a black and white shots of Jeon’s and color shots of Kim’s
accounts the story is split between the two. However, the color separation is
not consistent and it is in these segments, where Jeon suddenly is portrayed in
color, the significance of “Jeon Tae-il”, the symbol and not the person, is
truly revealed. In this brilliant piece of story telling, through film technique
and editing, director Park, in a very subtle way, connects the Jeon Tae-il to
the events that happens five years later.
The first
significant example of this is when Kim, on the run from the authorities, is
in hiding in a boiler room. In this isolation, Kim, in a color shot, is
portrayed almost in black and white with a blue tint. While writing on Jeon
Tae-il’s biography he finds himself standing face to face with Jeon Tae-il and
by following him he is brought into the light where Jeon Tae-il, in color, is
walking to the mining camp where he also is in this state of isolation before
his return to activism. In this shot Jeon is truly portrayed as a symbol of
strength and motivation for the isolated Kim, who himself is representing the
student movement.
The second scene
is when Jeon lights himself on fire and runs through the street. As Kim
Kyung-hyun writes in her chapter on A
Single Spark, the whole scene is anti-climatic and is only a fictional
representation of the actual event (118).
However, she argues that: “In the differences between Chon's
"actual death" and Kim's rewriting of it lie the issues of
representation and remembrance that A Single Spark questions.” (119). My
opinion is that this scene serves as the way Kim, as the films representative
of the student movement, sees the martyrdom of Jeon.
The last scene where
Jeon is represented in color underlines the link between the student movement
and Jeon. When Kim revisits the street where Jeon immolated himself, we see a
close-up shot of the hand of a person clinging on to the book Kim has written
about Jeon. Following the person down the street we see that it is Jeon who
himself is holding onto the book. In such, Jeon and his activism is reborn
through his initiative in the following self-sacrifice of the student movement.
Kim, Kyung Hyun. The remasculinization of Korean cinema. Duke University Press, 2004.
Lee, Namhee. "The South Korean student movement: undongkwon as a counterpublic sphere." Korean Society: Civil society, democracy and the state(2002): 132-164.
No comments:
Post a Comment