In Soyoung Kim’s reading, it is
mentioned that Madame Freedom was a
big hit in 1956 (Kim, 193). I was quite shocked, but at the same time
understood why this scandalous story of a professor’s wife, Sun-young Oh,
grabbed the attention of many at during that period.
Although some may argue that the
film is not as dramatic as the ones one would see today, Sun-young’s behavior
after having contact with the ‘Americanized or modernized world’, seemed too
drastic for 1950s. From what I know, the government had curfews for everyone
and had expectations of how women should behave. How was this film able to pass
all censorship? Why was this depiction of a shameful housewife so popular? Wouldn’t
there have been demand from conservative people (especially during the period
of neo-Confucian patriarchy (Kim, 190)) to let down the curtain?
But again, ‘mak-jang’ has
always received full attention, especially by Korean audience. Farfetched,
provocative stories are popular to this day. Perhaps, by badmouthing the ‘indecent
characters’, women found a way to release their han? (Kim, 190) Or maybe, many
women might have gotten vicarious satisfaction by watching Sun-young’s life?
Plus, going to the movies itself provided the women the opportunity to extend
their scope of movement (Kim, 186).
One thing that came up in my mind
was, why do people only focus on the ‘freedom’ that Sun-young gets? How about
Professor Jang? Couldn’t it be that he is also enjoying his ‘freedom’ by having
indefinable sensations with Eun-mi? In fact, if he really wanted his wife to
behave ‘accordingly (as a wife of a professor or a housewife), he might have
shown some action other than just telling Sun-young to quit her job. He could
have literally pulled her out of the store (although this may be a dishonorable
thing for a professor to do if he absolutely could not tolerate Sun-young’s
behavior. Instead, he chooses to have ‘flirty moments’ with one of his
students. To some extent, it seemed as if the director was legitimizing Prof. Jang’s
affair by constantly showing Sun-young’s scandal.
Han sa-jang was always being
watched or followed by his wife, but what about Prof. Jang? Wouldn’t he have
been the one with most freedom?
Another question that I had
regarding Sun-young was the symbolization her clothes (Hanbok vs. Western style
clothing) had with freedom. At the beginning, when she wasn’t influenced by
Westernization (did her role as an obedient housewife), she was wearing Hanbok.
However, her engagement to the westernized world altered not only her way of
thinking, behavior but also her looks. So when she returned to wearing Hanbok
(after being dumped by Chun-ho) I was expecting to see the obedient housewife
again, but she remained the same. In that case, what would have been the
purpose of her re-wearing Hanbok?
Kim Soyoung, "Questions of
Women's Film: The Maid, Madame
Freedom and Women," in South Korean Golden Age Melodrama, 185-200.
I like what you said about clothes. Remember in the last dance-hall scene when she shows up in a very revealing dress that contrasts so much with what she wore trying to return home? I thought that was interesting. Even though she wore Western clothes through a lot of the movie, they were always fairly conservative...until that last dance-hall visit, which to me, represented the climax of her exploring lifestyle.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete