One thing I noticed in
Madame Freedom was the way women were portrayed as completely dependent
on their husbands, and thus as not having any freedom at all since they have
everything to lose. Madame Oh, for example, simultaneously loses her job, her
home and her family once Mr. Han Tae su’s wife discovers their affair. Seyon Yeong must also ask her husband’s permission
in order to begin working. Alternatively, while the husbands in the film are
seemingly controlled by their wives— when Mr. Han Tae su is forcefully taken
away by his wife from his lunch date with Madame Oh, and when Mr. Oh deserts
his mistress, Ms. Park, as soon as his wife runs away when she sees them
together—in reality they have nothing to lose and receive no punishment for
their adultery.
The film also makes a
point of showcasing the modern woman as “a dangerous woman” who “articulates
the notion of freedom implicit in Americanization as sexual liberation” (Kim,
194). Madame Choi is viewed as the iconic representation of a modern,
westernized woman who seems to be carefree and who speaks freely about her
opinion on how women should act in these modern times. Yun-ju tells Madame Oh
that women are like withering roses, and that they must become economically
independent from their husbands. This, for me, implies that Yun-ju’s version of
freedom is a wife’s freedom only in relation to her husband. In addition, by “withering
roses” does she mean that wives will always need to be replaced by their
husbands with younger and fresher women, just as one would replace wilting
flowers in a vase? If this interpretation holds any validity, then it would
explain why the modern Korean woman feels the need to surround herself with “the
best American cosmetics” and clothes in order to make herself seem younger and
more appealing. While working at the Paris Boutique, Madame Oh encounters a
customer who compares women to prostitutes, because to him they have become
slaves to cosmetics which is natural prostitute behavior. Madame Oh is neither ashamed
nor deeply offended by this remark, and the customer is not at all apologetic,
thus implying that women who have fallen prey to western consumerist culture
are seen as provocative and dangerous as they are more prone to attract the
attention of potential lovers. Seyon Yeong’s own change in appearance soon
after she witnesses the modern scene of the dance club makes her realize that
she, too, can become sexually liberated and feel like the young, fresh woman
for the men whose wives have perhaps become “withering roses”.
Nice, I didn't think about that about the withering rose, interesting comparision though! I'd also add that it's as if the women can't really win in the situations shown on film, just like a flower- once it's withered, there is no way back. In a way they're fate is "doomed", every woman who became the "modern" woman met a not-so-great end. And if they refuse to try out the western consumerist culture, they continue being the women whose life is dictated by the husband, so they can't touch the "freedom".
ReplyDelete