In her
article Jinhee Choi makes reference to patriarchy in gangster films
as she briefly questions whether Korean “[...] gangster cinema
advocates and sustains patriarchy” (76)? In the case of the movie
Friends the symbolic figure
of the “father,” or surrogate patriarchal male character, is an
important element of the movie. The necessity for a reigning
patriarchal father figure can be seen in the power dynamics of the
four friends. Jun Sook is given the title of “boss” of the high
school because of his father's position as a powerful gangster. In a
patrilineal fashion his father's title is passed down to him. Dong Su
is given the title of “Second Boss” by Jun Sook due to his
strengths. Throughout their high school days Jun Sook acts in a
paternal fashion towards his friends as he defends them and scarifies
for them, ie. Jun Sook sacrifices his interest in Jin Sook for Sang
Taek.
In
her article Choi points out the symbolism of the high school setting,
a unique element of Korean gangster flicks. She considers the high
school to be be a symbolic “[...] society that replicates as well
as substitutes for some social norms of power and hierarchy” (69).
Jun Sook, our patriarch, constantly rebels against the high school
system when the teachers, enforcers of the social norms of power Choi
alludes too, try to make him conform and abandon his patriarchal
authority. The group of friends, lead by Jun Sook, disobey school
rules and Dong Su even vandalizes the school with a bat. This
loathing of modern social norms symbolized by the trashing of the
high school illustrates the main characters' desires to uphold
traditional patriarchal hierarchies over modern social norms in the
gangster realm of the movie.
Although
Jun Sook is seen as the patriarchal “father” figure Dong Su
rebels against him and attempts to replace him because of his own
patrilineal shame. Is Dong Su's rebellion against the patriarchal
family structure in his circle of friends what leads him down the
wrong path and assassinated? Is Dong Su meant to be seen as the “bad
guy” because of his rebellion? Does Jun Sook's position as
patriarch of his circle of friends emasculate and feminize the
others?
Source Cited:
Jinhee Choi, The South
Korean Film Renaissance: Local Hitmakers, Global Provocateurs.
Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2010. “No Blood? No
Tears! Gangster Cinema,” 60-84.
No comments:
Post a Comment